Philbony asks: Alex "A-Rod" Rodriguez issued a mea culpa last week for past steroid use. Said doping allegedly helped him become the best ballplayer of his, and perhaps all, time.
I'm no baseball fan, that should be understood. And I certainly don't condone cheating. Ultimately, he was rightly criticized.
But why should A-Rod (heh heh heh, he said "rod") have to explain himself to -- and be condemned by -- a pack of reporters, interviewers & analysts hopped up on Botox and cosmetic surgery?
After all, what's the difference between a top athlete using artificial means to enhance his on-field play vs. media all-stars employing artificial means to make themselves more visually appealing? They're both gaining that last little extra boost to excel in the qualities held in highest esteem by their profession.
Perhaps I would be willing to listen to more worthy "naturally gifted" correspondents who have been passed over for promotion or ignored by the mass audience because they are ugly.
On radio only, of course.